Institute for Applied Strategy Execution

The science of executing strategy.

The Institute researches how strategies are carried out inside organisations and works with their leaders to apply what the evidence shows.

ResearchPracticeResults

The execution gap

There is a gap between strategy and results. Measuring it is the first step.

The most cited data on execution point the same way: companies realise on average about 63% of the financial value their strategies promise, and only a third of managers can name their organisation's top three priorities.

Other figures circulate without an empirical basis. The claim that 70% of change initiatives fail, for example, does not survive a review of its sources (Hughes, 2011). That is why we measure before we claim, particularly in African contexts, where evidence is still scarce.

63%

of the financial value promised by strategies is realised, on averageMankins & Steele (2005)

1/3

of managers can name their company's top three prioritiesSull, Homkes & Sull (2015)

<10%

of managers say they can always rely on colleagues in other unitsSull, Homkes & Sull (2015)

How the Institute works

One cycle: research, apply, measure.

Each part of the Institute feeds the next. What we measure in the labs returns to the research.

01

Research

We ask how strategy turns into action and gather the evidence to answer those questions.

See the research
02

Praxis

We work with organisations on real execution problems, applying what the research shows.

See the Praxis Labs
03

Results

We measure what changed and publish the results, including those that do not confirm our hypotheses.

See the results
Academy

Carries the knowledge to individuals through masterclasses, fellowships and internships.

See the Academy

The results of each cycle set the questions for the next one.

Current research

Research themes

RQ1

From strategy to action

How strategic priorities lose clarity as they move from the executive committee to middle management.

RQ2

Execution routines

Which management routines, such as review meetings, performance dialogues and decision rights, are associated with better delivery.

RQ3

Culture and execution discipline

How organisational culture shapes execution discipline in public and private institutions.

RQ4

AI-supported execution

How AI-assisted monitoring can support execution without replacing managerial judgement.

See the research agenda

Principles

How we work

  • Evidence before opinion

    We start from data and published studies, and we state the limits of what we know.

  • We publish what we measure

    We define in advance what each lab will measure and publish the results, favourable or not.

  • Context matters

    We study execution in Angolan and African organisations, with their own constraints and resources, instead of importing recipes.

  • Practitioners are co-researchers

    The people who carry out strategy take part in producing the knowledge and are the first to benefit from it.

An executive team in a working session

Praxis

Execution labs inside organisations

In a Praxis Lab, an organisation works on a real execution problem, with a method and support from the research team. What is learned stays with the organisation and adds to the evidence.

  1. 1 · Diagnose
  2. 2 · Design
  3. 3 · Execute
  4. 4 · Measure

How a Praxis Lab works

Each dot is a member. Suricatus receives the signals and raises the alert.

Suricatus Network

An early-alert system made of people

Suricatus is a Human Sensory Network. Members capture weak signals in their everyday work, share them in a WhatsApp community and analyse them together, before they become obvious problems or opportunities.

Explore the network

Insights

Latest insights

The first publications are in preparation

Working papers, research notes and news from the Institute will appear here. Follow the Institute on LinkedIn to stay informed.

LinkedIn

Is execution stalling in your organisation?

We'd be delighted to share our views on your challenges.